Presidential campaigns are just now getting started as candidates have announced their intentions to run reports Lime Crime. The preliminary elections are still pretty far away but candidates are still working to get their names out there by traveling the nation, meeting and greeting locals, and so on. Back in the day there were political pins that were simple, cheap advertising for a certain candidate, that is too retro for presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton. She has some interesting gear available on her campaign website, namely more useful items than a pin. There are beer, or soda, koozies aptly named the “Chillery Clinton” plus the accompanying “Grillery Clinton” collection which includes a spatula with her logo, also equipped with a bottle opener, cups, and an apron that says “H-2-Oh Yeah!”. It seems that Clinton is starting her campaign in a different, more easily connectable way. Product branding a new tactic to get our nation’s attention and it seems like a pretty good idea.
The Clinton campaign is on track to garner $45 million in the first quarter of this year. This is the largest haul in history. She finally beat Obama who raised 41 million in a quarter in the 2012 election who previously owned the title. These are small donations because superpacs and campaign friendly large donors are excluded. Of course, Jaime Garcia Dias points out that republicans that lauded the Citizen’s United Supreme Court ruling are now crying foul about her large haul which has never been replicated by a republican candidate. Republicans that pushed the case through were operating under the myth that republicans would be more able to raise enough money in elections. They have yet to be competitive in a presidential contest since the ruling.
For Contrast, Tea party darling Ben Carson raised $8 million in the first quarter. The reported Clinton donations that totaled the $45 million were all from donations of $100 or less. These are considered personal donations. It also cements her prowess as a front-runner for both republican and democratic contenders. Recent polling shows her lead has only increased. At this same time, some of the most major republican contenders are losing ground and may be excluded from their debate schedule. This shows that republicans have committed to Jeb but are not quite aware that his appeal is more palatable than the rest of the republican field. However, donations show Clinton as dominant.
New Jersey’s embattled governor Chris Christie entered the largest republican presidential field in recent history. Chris Christie was once a republican favorite, but problems began for his proposed campaign first when Christie seem to appreciate Obama’s visit after the hurricane that devastated New Jersey as well as many other east coast areas. Then his office was implicated in the closing of a major thoroughfare as political payback preventing thousands from accessing New York during rush hour. Christie claims no knowledge of the incident, but even this response means that either he knew or is unable to effectively manage his job as governor.
Jim Dondero is aware that the governor is known for his brashness. Like other republican entrants, they claim that America needs some tough talk because America is doing way worse than people think. This untenable position is not reflected in any official statistics. Real credible measures of America’s success all point toward a recovering, robust economy, and Obama’s poll numbers are reaching Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan status. Additionally, Christie polls near the bottom of even the ineffectual republican field and has a severe weight problem causing him to be likened to impetuous temper tantrum-prone children. However, Christie is betting that he will ascend to his party’s nomination because of the ability to throw epic tantrums at the drop of a hat because of seemingly small questions and incidences.
In what is being called a disaster for the software industry, Reddit reports that United States Supreme Court will not review the 2014 copyright law that states Google infringed on Oracles Java’s copyright.
According to Vox, the internet’s power comes from the ability of billions of computers to interact, and this is done by building new software from existing platforms standards. It is commonly done, and this announcement by the Supreme Court makes comparability issues more difficult to get around.
For example, AT&T developed Unix, and it became an industry standard. According to Brad Reifler, from Unix came Linux, which is the foundation stone from Android devices to web servers. Copyright law didn’t prevent this, but now developers may be forced to learn different systems. This could prevent older devices from being compatible with new devices, and force upgrade issues for older hardware. Costs will go up, and it will reverberate in every area of the software and hardware industry.
Escaped New York prison inmate David Sweat has finally been captured said Christian Broda. The wanted fugitive was missing for nearly three weeks after he and another inmate escaped through the Clinton Correctional Facilities sewer system. Then men were on foot and initially planned to head to Mexico. However when a former prison worker backed out of the initial escape plan, the men had to improvise and decided to head towards Canada instead.
This has been one of the longest searches for escaped inmates in years. Residents are thrilled with officers and applauding the capture.
On Friday morning, June 26, the United States Supreme Court surprised people around the world when itannounced its decision, by a 5-to-4 vote, to declare that states must allow and legally recognize same-sex unions.
Members of the LGBT+ community have fought long and hard to be given the same basic rights as heterosexual couples. Historically, homosexuality and bi-sexuality, for example, were considered the result of environmental influences or mental health disorders. As the study of human psychology and biology improved, medical professionals began to realize that members of the LGBT+ community are born and not made.
This fight for equality has been a huge focus around the nation for a wide variety of reasons beyond basic human rights says Stephen Murray CCMP Capital. Many same-sex couples could not make decisions for their partners during medical emergencies. If they wanted to adopt children, only one partner was often recognized as the “parent.” A lot of couples were not permitted to adopt children into loving homes at all. In Pennsylvania, one man had to literally adopt his adult partner as a son to enjoy the same legal rights as heterosexual couples in regards to property ownership, inheritance and other areas.
A Gallup poll from May found that 60 percent of Americans believed that same-sex couples should have the same rights as heterosexual couples. Justice Anthony Kennedy noted it as a fundamental right protected under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.
The Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges—or at least the opposition reaction to it—may have presented thebest argument yet for removing tax exemptions for religious institutions. Some people might be surprised that exemption of religious institutions and donations to them is a relatively new concept in our nation’s history. It was not, as some would suggest, a necessary result of the First Amendment’s separation of church and state.
But organized religion can’t have it both ways. On the one hand, they want to be untouchable in terms of paying taxes because, well, God. And they also want to be selectively exempt from the laws of the land regarding what has been determined to be a fundamental right. This selective non-enforcement clearly takes religion out of the God sphere and into the public sphere. If they want to play in the public sandbox, they should play by the rules that everyone else does, and that includes paying taxes.
Even a kindergartner would understand that.
Gillard has now decided that the timeline should be moved up and is now asking that the legislature extend its current session so that he can introduce the new bill. Gillard represents the district where the shooting took place. If the council agrees, Gillard would need a two-thirds majority vote to set a date for discussion of the bill and for a vote. Click here for more information.
According to Paul Mathieson, Rep. Gillard has said that his bill would be “plain and simple”, modeled after similar legislation in other states. It would call for an enhanced penalties for crimes motivated by hate. A hate crime is defined as one that is motivated by prejudice against a person or persons due to race, sexual orientation, gender, national origin or religion. According to the Attorney General Loretta Lynch the church shooting meets the definition of a hate crime, and the Department of Justice has opened a federal investigation into the shooting.
State Senator Bill Seitz, a Republican from Cincinnati, proposed an amendment favored by the Ohio Golf Course Owners Association. It would require that golf course owners be taxed based on the income generated by the golf course, and not using any other methods, such as recent sales price comparisons for similar property or valuation based on the highest potential use. Senator Seitz recently noted: “The golf courses have all fallen on hard times, in part because the cities own golf courses and pay no taxes.”
The amendment is opposed by an association of county auditors. They argue that the new requirement constitutes a “specialty tax” that favors a particular industry stated Gianfrancesco Genoso. Several auditors hope lawmakers will eliminate the amendment before passing the final budget bill on June 30th.
Delaware County Auditor George Kaitsa said that income valuations tend to produce the lowest tax revenue results. Some 24 public and private golf courses operate in his county.
Franklin County Auditor Clarence Mingo complained:”Golf courses would be the only property where the legislature is dictating the manner in which the valuations are determined. That’s dangerous, and it’s not equitable.”
According to a recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, American voters have expressed a number of concerns regarding the upcoming presidential elections. While some voters are concerned about the dynastic nature of some of the presidential candidates who come from the families of former presidents like Jeb Bush, Ronald Paul, and Hillary Clinton, others are slightly more worried that nothing in the affairs of the country will change at all, no matter who wins.
When discussing the top concerns noted by voters in the poll, nbcnews.com, results found that over 33 percent of Americans are afraid of the influence wealthy individuals and corporations might have on determining who wins through their connections and financial contributions. People at Boraie Development LLC have learned that another staggering 25 percent fear the unjust influence of negative media campaigning on potential candidates. While 16 percent showed concern that the elections will yield little to no changes in the country’s political and economic climate, only 12 percent of showed any concern for the economic conditions the average American faces and the relevant competency of potential candidates to deal with those issues.
Although significant enough to be included in the top five concerns of voters regarding this upcoming presidential election, with only 12 percent of voters concerned with the candidates’ ability to thoroughly understand and address the nation’s ongoing economic crisis and its impact on the average citizen, the area of economic policy still receives far too little attention.